Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Bundschuh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 21, 2001PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 17, 2001, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
In July 1999, when claimant filed his original claim for unemployment insurance benefits, he disclosed that he was the sole proprietor of a seasonal business growing and selling plants and flowers and completed a self-employment questionnaire. He reported that his first growing season began in March 1999 and ended in July 1999 when he closed the business for the season.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of SchenkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of LuongoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Claim of DolcaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ArmbrusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of IbrahimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.