Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Salomone
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 8, 2005, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Claimant was a 50% partner and president of Robert Martin, Inc., a subchapter S corporation that ceased operations in August 2004. Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits and was determined to be ineligible. As relevant to this appeal, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that *1038claimant was not totally unemployed because of his status as an officer of an existing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Claim of DolcaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HaseltineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of MasciopintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of RozestratenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BuntingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Petrick (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of HindsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008