Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sichel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 13, 2001, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

At the time claimant, an architect, applied for unemployment insurance benefits, she was the sole shareholder and president of Tricycle Enterprises, Inc., a subchapter S corporation established in 1996 for the purpose of manufacturing and selling architectural woodwork. Claimant’s spouse, a master woodworker, was the general manager of the business while claimant worked as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KazinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of McEwenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of WahlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. In re the Claim of BurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RestivoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of DolcaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of ArmbrusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. In re the Claim of BrinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API