Legal Opinion
V Cable, Inc. v. Guercio
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 26, 2001No. 0:94-cv-05412PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
The captioned cases were tried before the Court non-jury. The purpose of this decision is to provide my findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52.
By two separate complaints, later consolidated, V Cable, Inc. and Cablevision Systems Corporation (“Cablevision” or “plaintiffs”) have asserted claims against defendant Thomas Guercio (“Guercio” or “defendant”), under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 553(a)(1), 605(a), and 605(e)(4) (the “Communications Act”). Specifically, the claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Myron LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Cablevision Systems New York City Corp. v. LokshinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Merchant v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Goldstein v. Time Warner New York City Cable GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Calabrese v. CSC Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Directv, Inc. v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BoonstraDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- DIRECTV, INC. v. BeauchampDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- DIRECTV, INC. v. BrowerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.