Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Time Warner New York City Cable Group
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1998No. 96 CIV. 7462(LBS), 97 CIV. 0673(LBS)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs, Steve Gruberg and Cable Access Network, Inc. (collectively “Gru-berg”), have brought two suits 1 against the Defendant, Time Warner Cable of New York City (“Time Warner”), 2 seeking equitable and declaratory relief, as well as damages, for claims arising out of the Cable Act 3 and various regulations promulgated thereunder. Presently before the Court are three motions: (1) the Plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a); (2) the Defendant’s motion to compel discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b) & 37(a); and (3) the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sikhs for Justice v. NathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- V Cable, Inc. v. GuercioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- CSC Holdings, Inc. v. KrautDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.