Legal Opinion
DIRECTV, INC. v. Beauchamp
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 2, 2004No. 2:02-cv-00200PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, DIRECTV, Inc. (“DIRECTV”), has sued Defendant, James Beauchamp (“Beauchamp”), alleging that he violated the Federal Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 605, the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, and the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-22 (the “Wiretap Act”), and Michigan common law by purchasing and using access cards and other devices (“Pirate Access Devices”) to decrypt, receive, and view DIRECTV’s encrypted satellite…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth DayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Agristor Financial Corp. v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2004
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BensonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004