Legal Opinion

Banking Commission v. Flanagan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Late in October, 1938, the plaintiff instituted a suit against the defendant by service of a summons. The defendant appeared by serving a notice of retainer. The notice of retainer was inclosed in an envelope and mailed to the attorneys for the plaintiff with a request that plaintiff’s attorney admit service. In response to this request plaintiff’s attorney signed the following admission:

“Due sufficient and personal service of the within notice of retainer admitted this 28th day of October, 1938. Robert B. Murphy, Attorney for Plaintiff.”

On December 21, 1938, plaintiff’s attorney mailed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Citizens Savings & Trust Co. v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Johnson v. RetzlaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wendlandt v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Harris v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Giese v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Harweger v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Callahan v. La Crosse Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hyslop v. MaxwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API