Legal Opinion

Foss-Hughes Co. v. Lederer

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1919No. 6470PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Raw. Action by the Foss-Hughes Company against Ephraim Rederer, Collector of Internal Revenue, First District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This is to all intents and purposes a case stated. The right to a jury trial was waived, and the case came on to be heard without a jury. The parties then stipulated all the facts. There remains at most only an ultimate fact finding, to be made under the evidentiary facts stipulated, or possibly only a question of law to be determined.

The general situation presented is that Act Cong. October 3, 1917, § 600 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6309¾a), provides (inter alia) for the collection of a tax upon all automobile trucks sold by the manufacturer,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rech-Marbaker Co. v. LedererDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Klepper v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  3. Walling v. ArmbrusterDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1943
  4. Warner-Patterson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  5. Charles Marchand Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API