Walling v. Armbruster
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
Able counsel for the parties have filed most excellent briefs in support of their contentions. Counsel for plaintiff state the issues as follows:(1) Whether the defendants are engaged in the production of goods for interstate commerce within the meaning of the Act.(2) Whether the defendants are operating a service establishment within the exemption granted by Section 13(a) (2) of the Act.
These questions will be discussed in the order stated.(1) In Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, 316 U.S. 517,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lenroot v. Hazlehurst Mercantile Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1945
- Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2020
- Lenroot v. KempDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1945
- Phillips v. Star Overall Dry Cleaning Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Phillips v. Star Overall Dry Cleaning Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945