Legal Opinion

Rech-Marbaker Co. v. Lederer

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1919No. 6088PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law. Action by the Rech-Marbaker Company against Ephraim Lederer, Collector of Internal Revenue.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

It is stipulated that plaintiff is entitled to judgment unless the tax collected from the plaintiff was one imposed by the Revenue Act of 1917, tit. VI, § 600 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6309¾a). The tax imposed is an excise tax, to be paid by those who sell the things enumerated, and is measured by 3 per cent, of the price for which the thing is sold. The general thought was to cover power trucks, along with automobiles and motorcycles. The thought was expressed as simply as possible in the act by making the tax collectible “upon all automobiles,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klepper v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  2. Foss-Hughes Co. v. LedererDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Walling v. ArmbrusterDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API