Warner-Patterson Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSiNNott, Judge
Plaintiff seeks to recover $6,109.97, with interest, alleged to have been erroneously exacted by the United States as excise taxes on articles known as the Warner lens and Patterson lens, between the dates of June, 1923, and June, 1925, *241inclusive, under provisions of section 900 of the revenue act of 1921 (42 Stat. 227, 291) and section 600 of the revenue act of 1924 (43 Stat. 253, 322).
Plaintiff, during the period covered by the claim involved in this suit, had an exclusive license to manufacture, sell, and distribute said lenses. Plaintiff during said period purchased the patent.for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carbon Steel Co. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Hancock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Kaltenbach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Foss-Hughes Co. v. LedererDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JareckiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Record Guild of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Acme Juicer Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Record Guild of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959