Legal Opinion

l-T-A

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided December 18, 2025No. ID 4151PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

29 I&N Dec. 362

(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4151 Matter of L-T-A-, Respondent Decided December 18, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Evidence that a respondent had a legal right to enter, live, work, and own property indefinitely in the country of proposed resettlement demonstrates that the respondent was offered “some other type of permanent resettlement” for purposes of the firm resettlement bar. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ilya Laksin, Esquire, New York, New York BEFORE: Board Panel: MULLANE, CREPPY, and GOODWIN, Appellate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. L. Xia v. Rex TillersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Rasaq Opyemi Sanusi v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. L-A-CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
  5. Amadou Sall v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A-E-V-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API