Legal Opinion
L-A-C
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3828PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 516
(BIA 2015) Interim Decision #3828 Matter of L-A-C-, Applicant Decided March 19, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Where an Immigration Judge finds that an applicant for asylum or withholding of removal has not provided reasonably available corroborating evidence to establish his claim, the Immigration Judge should first consider the applicant’s explanations for the absence of such evidence and, if a continuance is requested, determine whether there is good cause to continue the proceedings for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Aden v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. BagamasbadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shabanali Ladha Khatoon Ladha Farzana S. Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- W-Y-C-& H-O-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Wei Sun v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Alejandro Saravia v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Rosa Avelar-Oliva v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Garcia-Garcia v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.