Rasaq Opyemi Sanusi v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We consider here whether a Court of Appeals possesses jurisdiction to review the decision of an immigration judge to deny a motion for a continuance filed during an immigration proceeding.
Petitioner Rasaq Opyemi Sanusi, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of a February 26, 2001 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of a decision by Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Donn Livingston denying Sanusi’s request for relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 See In re Sanusi, Order and Oral Decision of the Immigration Judge, File No. A76…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sk Shahriair Majidi v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Deu Thapa v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- George Morgan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General, Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Nethagani v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.