City of Los Angeles v. Vickers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.
This action involves the exercise of the right of eminent domain. Decree of condemnation having-gone for plaintiff, defendant Youngworth filed a memorandum of his costs and disbursements, whereupon plaintiff filed its notice of motion to tax the costs. Upon the motion coming on to be heard the trial court made its order denying it. Prom this order plaintiff appeals.
The items of the cost bill to which exception was taken showed the payment of fees to certain experts upon the value of real property, in compensation for their time expended in testifying for respondent. These fees were in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- City of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- City of St. Louis v. MeintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Ottumwa v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.