Legal Opinion

Lee v. Phillips & Lomax Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 2000No. 93,148PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

T1 Appellant's Petition for Certiorari raises one issue. Does Oklahoma's Statute of Repose, found at title 12, section 109, of the Oklahoma Statutes, bar the assertion of Appellant's tort claims against an insurer and its agent? It does not.

T2 In April, 1982, a storm damaged the shingles on Beverly Lee's (Homeowner) home and the roof began to leak. She notified her homeowner's insurance agent, Phillip & Lomax Agency, Inc. (Agent), who submitted the claim to her insurance carrier, Country Preferred Insurance Co. (Insurer). The facts surrounding the roofs repair are in dispute.

13 Homeowner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neer v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Smith v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. McVay v. Rollings Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Gorton v. MashburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Zewdie v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Trinity Baptist Church v. Guideone Elite InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API