Legal Opinion

Gorton v. Mashburn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1999No. 90358PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

¶ 1 The present cause’s resolution requires delineation of the ambit of protection afforded to property owners by 12 O.S.1991 § 109 1 — the ten-year statute of repose for design or construction defects in completed improvements. 2

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 John Gorton [appellant 3 or Gorton] was a tenant of the Penn Brooke Office Park. The office park — owned by Mashburn [owner or appellee] — consists of six separate buildings built around a common area through which a stream flows. Wooden bridges across the creek provide pedestrians egress from the office complex. The bridges were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Neer v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Brown v. Alliance Real Estate GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Boyles v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Buck v. Del City Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Jean's Plumbing Heat & AirSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Smedsrud v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Durham v. Herbert Olbrich GMBH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Lee v. Phillips & Lomax Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Abbott v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API