Legal Opinion

Bird v. Bidwell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2009No. 35314-2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action seeking a determination that the plaintiffs had an implied easement by prior use. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I.FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Virgil and Lillis Mickelsen were the owners of an 80-acre parcel of property located in Fremont County. The property was rectangular in shape, with the long boundaries running north and south and the southern boundary bounded by a county road. The Mickelsens’ house was located in the southwest corner of the property near the county highway.

In December 1995, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thomas v. MadsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. KMST, LLC. v. County of AdaIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Shultz v. AtkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fenwick v. Idaho Department of LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Berg v. KendallIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cummings v. No Title Co of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Capstar Radio Operating Co. v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API