Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Atkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1976No. 11950PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs-respondents, George and Pauline Shultz, instituted this action against defendants-appellants, Norman J. “Pete” and Viola Atkins, and defendants, Thane and Margaret McAllister and Max A. and Lue Dean Williams, seeking a permanent right to draw and use water from a well located on the Atkins’ residential property. After a trial to the district court sitting without a jury, judgment was entered that the Shultzes had “a permanent right to have culinary and domestic water delivered from the well”. The Atkinses appealed. This court reverses the judgment for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  3. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Close v. RensinkIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ostrander v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Capstar Radio Operating Co. v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Elder v. Northwest Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Eliopulos v. Kondo Farms, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API