Legal Opinion

Zaltman v. Town Clerk of Stoneham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 27, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodman, J.

By this action the plaintiff seeks to compel the defendant town clerk of Stoneham to certify in accordance with G. L. c. 41, § 81V, that the plaintiff’s plan for the subdivision of certain land in Stoneham (the locus) has been constructively approved because the planning board (the board) failed to take final action on that plan or to file a certificate of such action within sixty days of its submission to the board. See G. L. c. 41, § 81U. The board’s motion to intervene as a party defendant was allowed. The trial judge heard evidence, filed findings of fact, and ordered that judgment enter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Selectmen of Pembroke v. R. & P. REALTY CORP.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Doliner v. Planning Board of MillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Kay-Vee Realty Co. Inc. v. Town Clerk of LudlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  5. M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elder Care Services, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Craig v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. J & R Investment, Inc. v. City ClerkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Kupperstein v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  5. Krafchuk v. BrooksMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API