Legal Opinion

Kupperstein v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 10, 2006No. 05-P-781PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This action came before the Superior Court on the plaintiffs’ complaint, captioned “Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” The plaintiffs sought an order requiring the planning board for the town of Cohasset (board) forthwith to endorse a plan as “approval under the subdivision control law not required,” and an order that the town clerk forthwith issue a certificate to the same effect. There is no dispute as to the facts, which are succinctly stated by the judge in his memorandum of decision and order on the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(c), 365 Mass. 754 (1974).

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kay-Vee Realty Co. Inc. v. Town Clerk of LudlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Lutheran Service Ass'n of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Craig v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Zaltman v. Town Clerk of StonehamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  5. Foley v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kitras v. Zoning AdministratorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API