Anderson v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendants’ exceptions and assignments of error challenge the authority of the court below to allow an amendment to a complaint in an action in which the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the original action. The exceptions are well taken and will be sustained.
In the former opinion (reported in 234 N.C. 271, 66 S.E. 2d 886), Ervin, J., speaking for the Court, said: “The complaint discloses upon its face that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action; for under the law of North Carolina the issue of whether an unprobated script is, or is not, a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Garrett v. . TrotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Miller v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Crawford v. Wayne County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- GEO. A. HORMEL & COMPANY v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Lane v. GriswoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.