Legal Opinion
Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 10, 2016No. 01-13-00447-CR, NO. 01-13-00448-CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Rebeca Huddle, Justice
A jury found appellant Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez guilty of felony evading arrest and aggravated assault and assessed his punishment at confinement for life for the aggravated assault charge and 50 years’ confinement for the evading arrest charge, to run concurrently. On appeal, Rodriguez, acting pro se, raises 14 issues. We affirm.
Background
In December 2011, complainant Jose Bribiescas was celebrating his fortieth birthday with friends at a sports- bar. Rodriguez approached one of Jose’s friends;-Claudia Atencio, and asked if he could buy her a drink. When she…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Carolyn Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016
- Cory Ray Shelby v. Shakka Shaneak James, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
- Cynthia Staley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2018
- Daniel Greco v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.