Legal Opinion

Janiec v. McCorkle

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 28, 1958PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

52 N.J. Super. 1 (1958)

144 A.2d 561

LAWRENCE JANIEC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LLOYD E. McCORKLE, PRINCIPAL KEEPER OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

LAWRENCE JANIEC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 12, 1958.

Decided August 28, 1958.

Before Judges STANTON, HALL and GAULKIN.

Mr. Samuel Carotenuto argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Alfred J. Skaf, attorney).

Mr. Solomon Lautman, First Assistant Prosecutor of Monmouth County, argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Vincent P. Keuper,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Carter v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. State v. BiegenwaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State of West Virginia v. Orville M. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. ZachowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API