Legal Opinion

State v. Biegenwald

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1984PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises under the provisions of the New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice (Code) authorizing a separate proceeding for purposes of determining the sentence to be imposed upon a defendant found by a jury to be guilty of the crime of murder. N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c. The case requires that we determine whether, during the penalty phase of a capital proceeding, the State may use as an aggravating factor, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(4)(a), a defendant’s prior conviction for murder when the appeal of that conviction has not yet been resolved. We now hold that a defendant having been found…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. BiegenwaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. State v. Di FriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API