State v. Biegenwald
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This appeal arises under the provisions of the New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice (Code) authorizing a separate proceeding for purposes of determining the sentence to be imposed upon a defendant found by a jury to be guilty of the crime of murder. N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c. The case requires that we determine whether, during the penalty phase of a capital proceeding, the State may use as an aggravating factor, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(4)(a), a defendant’s prior conviction for murder when the appeal of that conviction has not yet been resolved. We now hold that a defendant having been found…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. BiegenwaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. Di FriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.