Legal Opinion
State v. Washington
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 6, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 N.J. 244 (1966)
220 A.2d 185
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CARL WASHINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 23, 1966.
Decided June 6, 1966.
Mr. Edward Suski, Jr. argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Norman Heine, Camden County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.
The primary issue on this petition for post-conviction relief is whether the defendant, Carl Washington, was properly sentenced as an habitual criminal pursuant to N.J.S. 2A:85-12 and 13.[1] After the trial court denied the relief…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- State v. CulverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State v. MartiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. JenningsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- State v. GanttNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.