Legal Opinion

Hanie v. . Penland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The cause of .action alleged in tbe complaint was for wrongful death of Garfield Hanie, plaintiff’s intestate, by virtue of tbe negligence of Joe Eice, a special deputy of defendant Penland, sheriff of Buncombe County.. Tbe plaintiff offered in evidence tbe summons in tbe action, issued 8 March, 1926, and served on tbe defendants on 9 and 12 March, 1926. It further appears from tbe record that plaintiff’s intestate was killed on 7 April, 1924. It does not appear from tbe record that there was any evidence whatever offered tending to show that tbe suit for wrongful death of plaintiff’s,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Gulledge v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Belch v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Gulledge v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Winslow v. . Carolina Conference AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Tieffenbrun v. . FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Tieffenbrun v. FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Webb v. EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Neely v. . MinusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API