Legal Opinion
Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Union County Hospital Ass'n
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 21, 1951No. 525PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBakNhill, J.
"When new matter is alleged in an answer by way of an affirmative defense, the sufficiency of tbe plea as a defense to plaintiffs cause of action may be tested either by demurrer or by motion to strike. Both remedies are available to plaintiff. Each is an appropriate method of testing the sufficiency of the plea as a defense to plaintiff’s cause of action.
“The plaintiff may in all cases demur to an answer containing new matter, where, upon its face, it does not constitute a . . . defense; and he may demur to one or more such defenses . . . and reply to the residue.” G.S. 1-141; Williams v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Herndon v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Barden v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Davis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- TROY LUMBER COMPANY v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.