Legal Opinion

Is Smick Lumber v. Hubschmidt

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 7, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

177 N.J. Super. 131 (1980)

425 A.2d 709

I.S. SMICK LUMBER, PLAINTIFF,

v.

MARTHA E. HUBSCHMIDT AND JOHN F. HUBSCHMIDT, HER HUSBAND ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Cumberland County.

Decided November 7, 1980.

Lawrence Point for plaintiff (Acton & Point, attorneys).

Harry R. Adler for defendants Hubschmidt.

MILLER, J.S.C.

This is an action by a lumberyard on an unpaid bill for materials against the contractor and also against the owners of the land on which the materials were used. The suit against the landowners is based upon the Mechanics Lien Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:44-64 et seq.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Wilson v. Inhabitants of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. Alexander v. RekoonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. McKenna v. Harrington Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. RA Intile Realty Co. v. RahoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Coldwell Banker v. BLANCKE PWLLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Is Smick Lumber v. HubschmidtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. City of East Orange v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013
  5. Roland-Leopoid v. KhouryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API