McKenna v. Harrington Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Pield.er, whoi filed the following opinion: “Without attempting to discuss the evidence presented by the respective parties to establish whether complainant’s place of residence was in this state, at Long Branch, or out of the state, at New York City, I shall say that I find she was a resident of Long Branch before, during and after the month of July, 1918. Comp.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Pield.er, whoi filed the following opinion: “Without attempting to discuss the evidence presented by the respective parties to establish whether complainant’s place of residence was in this state, at Long Branch, or out of the state, at New York City, I shall say that I find she was a resident of Long Branch before, during and after the month of July, 1918. Comp. Slal. p. 5137 ¶ 59, under which defendant attempted to make legal service on complainant of notice to redeem, for the purpose of cutting off her equity of…
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons •stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chan•cellor Fielder.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kay'S—15.
For reversal—Hone.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Jersey City v. Division of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Is Smick Lumber v. HubschmidtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Shoshoni Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Roland-Leopoid v. KhouryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997