Legal Opinion

Roland-Leopoid v. Khoury

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 7, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WINKELSTEIN, J.S.C.

The issue presented in this landlord/tenant action is whether N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53(a) requires that service of the notice to quit to obtain possession of the premises must be made personally by the landlord or the landlord’s agent or whether service by certified mail is sufficient.

*374The facts in this case are undisputed. Plaintiffs are the landlords and defendant is the tenant in the property known as 124 Atlantic Avenue, Atlantic City, New Jersey. The parties have an oral month to month lease. The property is a two unit, owner occupied building, with the landlords residing in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. REISMAN EX REL. REISMAN v. Great Amer. RecreationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Wilson v. Inhabitants of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  5. Wohlegmuth v. 560 Ocean ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Orden v. Township of WyckoffNew Jersey Tax Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API