Wilson v. Inhabitants of Trenton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
■ Oír error to the Supreme Court. For opinion by the Supreme Court, see ante p. 178. This writ of error has brought up the record of a judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming proceedings taken by the city of Trenton, by which lands of plaintiff in error were condemned for a public street and an assessment for the expenses-of the improvement imposed on other lands belonging to him..
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Magie, J.
The principal question presented in this case-was raised by a reason filed on the return of the certiorari in-the Supreme Court, objecting to the assessment upon plaintiff in error, on the ground that certain notices had not been given-as required by law.
The law regulating the mode in which lands in the city of' Trenton may be taken and condemned for public highways- and assessments may be imposed to pay for the same,, is, in-the respect now in question, contained in the provisions of the-“Act to provide for the more efficient government of…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Alley v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Bank of Columbia v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Scorza v. DeatherageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Zollman v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.