Legal Opinion
Reeves Brothers, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. U. S. Laminating Corp. And Travis Rauch, and Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 5, 1969No. 32441_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
While this suit for infringement raises the usual host of issues and sub-issues common to all patent cases, the basic controversy is over the obviousness, and thus the validity, of the underlying patent. Since Judge Bartels’ careful and extensive opinion 1 deals at some length with the factual underpinnings, we shall try to avoid repetition, except where ncessary to clarify our reasons for agreeing with his holding that the patent was invalid for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1964.)
Reeves Brothers, Inc. (“Reeves”), as* signee of the original patentee,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Anton Lorenz v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Formal Fashions, Inc., and Paul Kellner v. Braiman Bows, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- In re WyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Julie Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Guildline Instruments, Inc., and Hallmark Standards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.