Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1995No. CV-94-0060-PRPublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

Elizabeth Maxwell petitions us to review a court of appeals opinion affirming a trial court ruling that the doctrine of novation barred Maxwell’s claim that a contract was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. See Maxwell v. Fidelity Fin. Servs., Inc., 179 Ariz. 544, 880 P.2d 1090 (Ct.App.1993). We granted review to examine the law dealing with grounds for novation and unconscionability and to determine whether the principles of contract interpretation announced in Taylor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 175 Ariz. 148, 854 P.2d 1134 (1993), are applicable…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. In Re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API