Legal Opinion
Industrial Commission v. Palmer
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1933No. 23589PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAmjsn, J.
The plaintiff in error, the Industrial Commission of Ohio, sets up the following as the issues of law in this case:
“1. Is the widow of a deceased workman who has proved no injury to the deceased entitled to compensation from the state insurance fund?
“2. Is the widow of a deceased workman whose death resulted from carbon monoxide poisoning due to the continued inhalation of carbon monoxide gas over a long period of time entitled to compensation from the state insurance fund?
“3. Does the charge of the court permitting recovery for a disease ‘contracted’ in the course of employment correctly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prouse v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Renkel v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Ramsay v. Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Van Vleet v. Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Industrial Commission v. BartholomeOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Industrial Commission v. UleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.