Legal Opinion

Martin v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1897No. Nos. 10,574—(222)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Russell, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

On October 28, 1895, Joseph A. Martin, the husband •of this plaintiff, died intestate in the county of Crow Wing, in this state. They had been husband and wife for many years, but had no children. On April 27, 1896, the plaintiff was duly appointed administratrix of her husband’s estate, and in that capacity brings this action. In the complaint it is alleged that in the year 1882 certain officers and employes of the Northern Pacific Railway Company, other than Joseph A. Martin, voluntarily organized and ■associated together under the name of the Northern Pacific Bene*522ficial Association, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMahon v. . RauhrNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Burt v. LathropMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Carr v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Glover v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Martin v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  5. Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API