Legal Opinion

Carr v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1924No. 17591PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Carr, commenced this action in the superior court for Franklin county, seeking recovery of damages from the defendant beneficial association, alleged to have resulted to him from the negligence of incompetent physicians and surgeons of the association in treating him at its hospital while a member of the association, and from the negligence of the association in selecting such incompetent physicians and surgeons and assigning to them the duty of treating him, while in its hospital. The plaintiff’s complaint was demurred to by the association upon the sole ground “that the facts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Fire Insurance Patrol v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. ArtistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  4. Laubheim v. De Koninglyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot MaatschappyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marshall v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Hanson v. Saint Luke's United Methodist ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Glover v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Plasterer v. PaineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API