Legal Opinion

Home National Bank v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1905No. 20,519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Boone Circuit Court; Joseph M. Babb, Special Judge. Action by tbe Home National Bank against John O. Hill. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellant, plaintiff below, as a hona fide holder of a promissory note payable at the Home National Bank of Thorntown, Indiana, sued thereon to recover against the defendant, John C. Hill, appellee herein. The latter answered the complaint in three paragraphs, the first of which was subsequently withdrawn. The second was a verified plea of non est factum. By the third paragraph he set up certain facts disclosing the method by which his signature to the note in suit was obtained by Joseph D. Cunningham. Appellant’s demurrer to the third paragraph of the answer was overruled. Eeply: (1) General…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. LinaburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Trambly v. RicardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Cline v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Fudge v. MarquellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. HuddlestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. First National Bank v. DoedenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Thompson v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Hegeman v. FettyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Consolidated Garage & Sales Co. v. DiltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API