Trambly v. Ricard
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.
The first count in the plaintiff’s declaration is for trespass to real estate, and removing the plaintiff’s furniture. *260The second is for the conversion of the same furniture. The defendants, in justification of their acts, rely upon an alleged breach of the plaintiff’s written agreement, which stated that he borrowed the furniture of them, and by which he agreed to hold the furniture as their property, paying them a weekly sum for the use of the same, with the privilege of buying it at a price named. To this contract, the plaintiff, being unable to read or write, affixed his mark. He…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- French v. ViningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Walker v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Selden v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.