Legal Opinion

Jeffreys v. . Hocutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court below rendered the following judgment, in part: "That the exceptions of the defendants as to amount of rents and an amount for personal property charged to the defendant, Hocutt, while he was acting as guardian, and as such guardian was cultivating the lands in dispute, should be sustained. The court further finds as a matter of law, that the defendant, B. A. Hocutt, should account for rents of the lands from 11 April, 1924, up to the present, and that he is entitled as a matter of law to the counterclaim of all improvements placed upon said lands since that date, as well as taxes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Walker v. . CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
  3. W. A. Hagler and Wife v. . R. D. McCombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Pamlico County v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Hickman v. MulderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Beam v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API