Legal Opinion

Anderson v. . Wilkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1906PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following are the facts found by the Judge: The plaintiffs contracted to sell to the defendant a lot in Wilson for $1,000, and tendered a deed for it, but the defendant refused to pay the purchase money, alleging that the title is defective. The lot is a part of a larger parcel of land in the same town which was devised to the feme plaintiff (formerly Lucy Whitehead) by her father, H. G. Whitehead. He had four other children, Robert B., H. G., William B., and James S. Whitehead, all of whom survived him. Before 31 August, 1896, the feme plaintiff had intermarried with her co-plaintiff and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Randall v. KreigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Bass v. Roanoke Navigation & Waterpower Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sanders Ex Rel. Pratt v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Piedmont Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Green Ex Rel. Green v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Beam v. . GilkeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Thayer v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API