Legal Opinion
Saklad v. Hurley Shoe Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 20, 1933No. 3344PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit based upon letters patent No. 1,586,126. The defenses are invalidity of the patent and non-infringement.
Statement of Facts.(1) On May 25, 1926, letters patent of the United States No. 1,586,126 were issued to the plaintiff on his application filed August 26, 1925.(2) This patent related to an improved last used in the manufacture of boots and shoes, designed to support the arch of the foot of the wearer.(3) The first claim of the patent is as follows:
“1. An improved last provided with a longitudinal instep arch extending from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Trico Products Corporation v. Apco-Mossberg CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932
- Trico Products Corp. v. Rico Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hazeltine Research v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954
- Richards v. Williamstown Sch. Bd.Vermont Superior Court · 2005