Legal Opinion

Consolidated Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade Commission. Container Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade Commission. Superior Products v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1952No. 6428-6430_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

These are petitions to review and set aside orders of the Federal Trade Commission, which, on its part, asks that the or ders be enforced. The orders complained of direct petitioners to cease and desist from selling or distributing in commerce as defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 41 et seq. “push cards, punchboards or other lottery devices which are to be used or may be used in the sale or distribution of merchandise to the public by means of a game of chance, gift enterprise or lottery scheme”. Petitioners contend that the Commission is without jurisdiction over them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
Modernistic Candies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
Chas. A. Brewer & Sons v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
Globe Cardboard Novelty Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

Marco Sales Company, a Corporation, and Marvin O. Baer, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
Surf Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
Zitserman v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
Gay Games, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
Seymour Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.