Legal Opinion

Lindeman v. Rosenfield

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellee, against the appellant and one Edward D. Scuddpr, upon a certain writing obligatory, of which the following is a copy :

“ Know all men by these presents, that we, Edward D. Scudder and Frank Lin deman, are each hold and firmly bound unto Emanuel Rosenfield in the sum of one hundred dollars, for the payment of which we each severally bind ourselves, our heirs and executors, upon the conditions following, to wit: Whereas the said Edward I). Scudder has this day been appointed by said Rosenfield an agent for ‘The North American Attorneys’ and Tradesmen’s Protection…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hunt v. StandartIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Abel v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Bristol Milling & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Maxwell v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. WinchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Jeffries v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Mount v. DehavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Riner v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API