Legal Opinion

Mount v. Dehaven

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1902No. 3,498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Fayette Circuit Court; F. S. Swift, Judge. Action by James I. Dehaven against- James C. Mount, administrator of the estate of Theodore L. Griffis, deceased, on a claim based upon certain promissory notes. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobim-soit, P. J.

Judgment in appellee’s favor on a claim of two notes, — one for $1,600, with six per cent, interest, dated December 19, 1888, and due in one year; the other for $1,000, with like interest, dated January 30, 1890, and due in one year; both executed by appellant’s decedent, Theodore L. Griffis, and payable to appellee. Theodore L. Griffis died May 6, 1890, leaving two sons and a widow who was a childless second wife. At the time of his death *128lie was engaged in the retail dry-goods business, and was largely indebted. Soon after his death the two sons purchased the widow’s interest in the whole…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Muldon v. WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Bristol Milling & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Maxwell v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Kelso v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Credit Bureaus Adjustment Department v. Cox Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State ex rel. J. B. Speed & Co. v. TraylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Indianapolis Conservatory of Music v. McConnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Prigge v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API