Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Board of Trustees

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1974No. Civ. 42008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON, Acting P. J.

Petitioners Rutherford, Strohbeen and Tremaine, nurses employed by the Bellflower Unified School District, sought to review an administrative decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) by means of a writ of mandate directing the respondents, the five elected members of the Board of Trustees of the Bellflower Unified School District (hereinafter referred to as the Board), to vacate their decision not to employ the petitioners for the school year of 1972-1973. The trial court granted the writ, and both the petitioners and respondents have appealed.

The chronological…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bekiaris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Olson v. HickmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Ward v. Fremont Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. McGlone v. Mt. Diablo Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Doyle v. City of ChinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Card v. Community Redevelopment Agency of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. A.B.C. Federation of Teachers v. A.B.C. Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Plumbing, Heating & Piping Employers Council v. QuillinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Campbell Elementary Teachers Assn., Inc. v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API