Legal Opinion

Olson v. Hickman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1972No. Civ. 12982PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

On February 28, 1972, we filed our decision * reversing the judgment of the superior court and directing that court to issue a writ of mandate which would accomplish petitioner Olson’s reinstatement to his civil service position in the Sacramento County Assessor’s office and the payment of back salary.

On April 19, 1972, we granted petitioner’s application for a temporary stay of the remittitur in order to- consider his motion for an allowance of an attorney fee of $1,500 pursuant to Government Code section 800. * His motion came on regularly for hearing in open, court on May…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pearson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Alta-Dena Dairy v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Curphey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Wilkinson v. LundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Wilson v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. In Re PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API