Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Monterosso

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 28, 2010No. Case 07-61693-CIVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OMNIBUS ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LI-MINE FOR ADVERSE INFERENCES

JOAN A. LENARD, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) motions in limine for adverse inferences against Defendants Luis E. Vargas (‘Vargas”), Lawrence Lynch (“Lynch”), and GlobeTel Communications Corp. (“GlobeTel”). On February 26, 2010, the Commission filed its Motion in Limine for Adverse Inferences Against Luis E. Vargas and to Strike Affirmative Defenses (D.E. 255). 1 The same day, the Commission filed its Motion in Limine for Adverse…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Karen Renee Augustus, a Minor, by Charles A. Augustus, Her Father, and Next Friend v. The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Carl D. Wehling and Geraldine D. Wehling v. Columbia Broadcasting SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  2. United States v. MarderDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Johnson Outdoors Inc. v. Navico, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2011
  5. Parker v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API