Legal Opinion
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 24, 2017No. Civ. No. 15-127 (RHK/FLN)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge
In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Presently before the Court is Ung’s Motion for Class Certification. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Motion.
BACKGROUND
Universal is the financing arm of Interstate Auto Group, Inc., d/b/a CarHop (“CarHop”), an Edina, Minnesota company that sells used ears nationwide…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Blades v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ginwright v. Exeter Finance Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Davis v. Capitol One Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Douglas Phillip Brust, D.C., P.C. v. Opensided MRI of St. Louis, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Hirsch v. USHealth Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
- Jackson v. Locust Medical, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.