Legal Opinion

Blades v. Monsanto Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2005No. 03-3993PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.-

Plaintiffs/Appellants brought this case as a putative class action under sections four and fifteen of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 & 16, for treble the damages caused by an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in violation of section one of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Appellants appeal from the district court’s1 denial of their motion to certify two classes. We affirm.

I. Appellants’ Allegations and Procedural History

Appellants allege as follows: Monsanto wished to extract the monopoly profits it would have earned from certain genes it had patented, which could be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API